Direct support for data: URL format in fo:external-graphics

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Direct support for data: URL format in fo:external-graphics

Rick Bullotta
Any plans to support/implement the data:image/xxx;base64,... format for
inlining graphics (without needing to further wrap in an SVG, a very
unnecessary step, IMO)?  I could look at implementing this if it doesn't
already exist or isn't in process.

Thanks!

- Rick


Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Direct support for data: URL format in fo:external-graphics

Jeremias Maerki
I've published a solution a few weeks ago. You can find it here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-user&m=110875657902117&w=2

I will look to it that direct RFC2397 support will make into the next
release.

HTH

On 09.06.2005 19:29:03 Rick Bullotta wrote:
> Any plans to support/implement the data:image/xxx;base64,... format for
> inlining graphics (without needing to further wrap in an SVG, a very
> unnecessary step, IMO)?  I could look at implementing this if it doesn't
> already exist or isn't in process.


Jeremias Maerki

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

RE: Direct support for data: URL format in fo:external-graphics

Rick Bullotta
In reply to this post by Rick Bullotta
Perfect, Jeremias!

Amazing that Google passed it by... <g>


-----Original Message-----
From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[hidden email]]
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2005 2:26 PM
To: [hidden email]
Subject: Re: Direct support for data: URL format in fo:external-graphics

I've published a solution a few weeks ago. You can find it here:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=fop-user&m=110875657902117&w=2

I will look to it that direct RFC2397 support will make into the next
release.

HTH

On 09.06.2005 19:29:03 Rick Bullotta wrote:
> Any plans to support/implement the data:image/xxx;base64,... format
for
> inlining graphics (without needing to further wrap in an SVG, a very
> unnecessary step, IMO)?  I could look at implementing this if it
doesn't
> already exist or isn't in process.


Jeremias Maerki